What is nuclear energy and how it is obtained


etec-nm.com keyword stats



Most current Google search phrases:

nuclear+engineers+texas  

How Did ISL Uranium Mining Begin?

It's time to rewrite the history books. Inheap leach experiment." Results were good on
Situ Leach Mining (ISL), or Solution Mining,the test, and Utah pioneered ISL mining. Snow
was not first commercially started in Bruni,wrote in an August 2, 1960 memo, "The
Texas in 1973 by Westinghouse, a consortiumfavorable results of the heap leach project
of oil companies and others. The birthplaceand other research indicate that the process
of ISL was never South Texas, as some havecan be successfully applied in many of the
claimed. It was begun in Wyoming, about 16low-grade areas to recover much of the
years before an ISL operation was started inmineralization." Later in his report, Snow
Texas. Why there has been a whitewash overcalculated reserves from random samples
the true history of ISL is not our concern.obtained from previous drilling at Lucky Mc,
This series is an in-depth investigation into"The estimated reserve for the block is
how and why ISL mining came about, how it has147,000 tons @ 0.0361 percent U3O8, or
been tested over a period of nearly 50 years,106,616 pounds of U3O8." He estimated the
and why this type of uranium mining will playprogram would cost $111,471. Using a value of
an important role in providing U.S. utilities$6/pound for U3O8, the anticipated returns
with the raw fuel to power nuclear reactorswere calculated as follows:50 percent
for the next few decades.In this modern erarecovery:  53,318  pounds:  $208,377
of uranium mining, extremely skilled
engineers, hydrologists and geologists25 percent recovery: 26,654 pounds: $
establish ISL mining operations. Most48,453That was just the start. By the end of
insiders compare an ISL operation to a waterthe decade, Shirley Basin's solution mining
treatment plant. It's really that simple tooperation was producing U3O8 at comparable
understand. However, as with every modernlevels to present day production at any of
industrial operation, the roots of ISL miningthe major U.S. ISL facilities. In a paper
came about in a less genteel or sophisticatedpresented by Ian Ritchie and John S.
manner. In 1958, Charles Don Snow, a uraniumAnderson, entitled "Solution Mining in the
mining and exploration geologist employed byShirley Basin," on September 11, 1967, at the
the Utah Construction Company, wasAmerican Mining Congress in Denver, Colorado,
investigating a Wyoming property for possiblethese Utah International executives explained
acquisition for his company. During thethe success of the Shirley Basin solution
course of that visit, he discovered a newmining operation. In a summary explaining the
method of uranium mining and helped pioneercompany's activities, we discovered the
its development into the modern form ofShirley Basin operation not only filled the
ISL.Since 1957, R.T. Plum, president ofAtomic Energy Commission (AEC) allocation
Uranyl Research Company, had beenrequirements from 1962 through 1969 but we
experimenting with a leach solution on hislearned of the sizeable commitments into the
property at the Lucky June uranium mine.future Shirley Basin was to fill:"In 1968
"They mixed up the sulfuric acid solution andsales of uranium concentrate were made to
just dumped it on the ground, and soaked itpurchases other than the AEC. One of the
through the material and collected it in afirst sales was to Sacramento Municipal
little trench at the end," Charles Snow toldUtility District with a minimum of 950,000
StockInterview. It wasn't very scientific.pounds to a maximum of 1,100,000 pounds of
Snow added, "They were just learning how, anduranium concentrate in 1971. Additional
I observed it and thought that thecontracts were signed with General Electric
application could be made through some of theCompany and with Nordostschwerzerische
ore that we had in the Lucky Mc mine." TheKraftwerke A.G. (Baden, Switzerland). The
company was mining uranium this way becausecontracts called for delivery of 8,000,000
it was below the grades miners were used to,pounds of concentrate to GE between 1968 and
when mining. As Snow noted, "It was not worth1975, and 500,000 pounds of concentrate to
mining." But it was practically at theNOK commencing in July 1969."ConclusionThe
surface. He explained what they were doing atsingle reason solution mining stopped, well
the Lucky June, "There was an area wherebefore the first "commercial" ISL operation
uranium leached out to the surface in a smallbegan in Bruni, Texas in 1973, was because of
area, and it had a clay under-bed. Thesethe improved market forecast for uranium in
people put solutions onto the surface,the 1970s. Utah Construction switched to open
collected the solution, and ran it by resinpit mining because they needed to produce a
beads to absorb the uranium."While they onlylot more uranium. The nuclear renaissance of
recovered about $3600 worth of uranium,the 1970s demanded massive quantities of
roughly 600 pounds, Snow was impressed. Heuranium to fuel the rapidly growing nuclear
later wrote an inter-office memorandum inpower industry.Don Snow's initial field
July 1959, with the subject header: "Recoverytests, begun in the late 1950s, resulted in
of Uranium from Low Grade Mineralizationcontinuous production achieved by late 1962.
using a leach in place process." In hisSubsequently, production in the underground
conclusion, Snow recommended, "From theuranium mine was shut down by May 1962. The
preliminary information available, it appearsunderground mine was maintained in a standby
that it will be possible to treat very lowcondition until 1965, when all underground
grade mineralization for recovery of uraniumoperations were written off. Millions of
at a large net profit." He explained thepounds were mined by Utah Construction
process to his bosses, encouraging them tothrough its ISL operations in Shirley Basin.
consider this as an option:"In brief, theIt wasn't heap leaching.Sufficient evidence
process introduces a leach solution onto theconfirms that Wyoming, not Texas, first
surface of the ground and allows the solutionpioneered commercial ISL mining. Not only
to percolate down through the area to bewere well fields designed as early as 1960,
leached. The solution is then recovered frombut the entire concept of an ISL "water
wells and circulated through an ion exchangetreatment" plant can trace its roots to Utah
circuit with the barren solution beingConstruction's pioneer work. Everything from
returned to the leach area. Recovery of theinjection wells to production wells were
uranium is made by stripping from the ionpioneered in the early 1960s. We challenged
exchange medium."He wanted the UtahCharles Don Snow that some have claimed it
Construction Company to try this method ofwas heap leaching, not ISL mining. Snow shot
mining where there was low gradeback, "No, we drilled holes in the ground and
mineralization. Snow succeeded in convincingthe material had never been mined. We got our
his bosses. That began yet another innovationideas, certainly, from heap leaching, which
for Utah Construction Company, the samecame from the copper industry." Snow
company which helped construct the Hooverexplained that after the solution mining
Dam, decades earlier, before it got into theexperiment was successful, "A recovery plant
uranium mining business.Utah Constructionwas designed and put into the hoist house,
Becomes the First Commercial ISLwhere they had had the underground mine. That
MinerNewspaper reports, through the 1960s,was designed by Robert Carr Porter and Ian
illustrate that ISL mining was in full bloomRitchie." Snow added, "In fact, Ian Ritchie
more than a decade before anyone in Texasand J.S. Anderson have a U.S. Patent on the
began a commercial ISL operation. On June 18,well completion procedures that we used at
1964, the Riverton Ranger newspaper reported,Shirley Basin."Snow pondered if his friend
"The Shirley Basin mine is on a standbyJack Bailey may have exported the ISL
basis. The timbers are being maintained andtechnology to Texas. "Jack Bailey was the
the water pumped out. Total production comesShirley Basin project manager for the
from solution mining." Between 1962 and 1969,underground mine when we switched over to
ISL was the only method producing uranium atsolution mining," Snow said. "He later went
Utah's Shirley Basin Wyoming. Later in thatto work for Chevron, and Chevron had
same article, under the section entitled,operations in Texas. I believe they even
"Gas Hills Solution Mining," it was reported,experimented with solution mining. Now,
"The Four Corners area is 'mined' by solutionwhether or not Jack was directly involved, I
mining techniques similar to those employeddon't know." As it is with history, many of
at Shirley Basin." Credit for this new miningthe old-timers are gone. We were told Jack
method is also reported in that same article,Bailey had had a stroke a number of years
"Lucky Mc introduced the heap leach processback, and did not trace this further. There
of recovering values from low grade ores inmay have been others. "Some of the people
1960."Charles Snow explained how his companyfrom that area (Shirley Basin) had gone to
made the transition from underground miningTexas," Snow recalled. "There is
to solution mining, "The underground miningdocumentation, it was published information,
at Shirley Basin was very expensive, and weand a lot of people who went to Texas, came
were having a lot of heavy ground problems."from the Wyoming area. So, I'm sure there
The sandstone aquifers containing the uraniumwasn't a paucity of information being
were uncemented and brittle, supported withtransferred." Ironically, the
timbers. "In some places, it was too heavy toWestinghouse-led consortium, which included
hold with timbers," said Snow. "We had to useU.S. Steel and Union Carbide, among others,
steel sets underground, and it was evenwas called Wyoming Minerals. Now we know
mashing the steel sets. So the expenses wereexactly why they chose that name.While there
getting very high."Water was flowing into thehave been a number of ISL operations built
open drifts at prodigious rates. Snowand operated in Texas, there may be little
recalled, "Barney Greenly said, 'Let's tryfuture for uranium mining in that state,
solution mining over here.' They did a test,unless there are new discoveries. By a few,
and it did operate quite well. They got someTexas has been inaccurately called the "home
pretty good results. So the underground mineof ISL mining." Perhaps that came about
was shut down, and they went to abecause ISL operations continued, during the
solution-mining program to produce theuranium depression of the past two decades,
allocated pounds in the Shirley Basin area."with small amounts of production occurring in
The procedure was tested for a few yearsTexas. According to Energy Information
before a full-scale commercial productionAdministration figures published in June
began. This fulfilled 100 percent of Utah's2004, uranium reserves in Texas stand at 23
Shirley Basin uranium production allotmentmillion pounds of U3O8 based upon $50/pound
from the AEC.There were problems at first.uranium. By comparison, Wyoming and New
"We started out initially using sulfuricMexico reserves, using that same benchmark,
acid, and we had some reaction withreach as high as 363 million and 341 million
carbonates in the formation." Sulfuric acidpounds, respectively.This may explain the
plus calcium carbonate produces calciumrush by junior exploration companies, such as
sulfate, and this plugged up the formation.Strathmore Minerals (TSX: STM; Other OTC:
Calcium sulfate is gypsum, which wasSTHJF), Energy Metals Corporation (TSX: EMC),
insoluble in the leach solution. "It tendedUR-Energy (TSX: URE), Uranerz Energy (OTC BB:
to plug up the formation and reduce theURNZ), Kilgore Minerals (TSX: KAU) and
transmissivity of the fluid from the inputothers, to Wyoming. The large quantities of
hole to the output recovery hole."To preventpounds are in Wyoming, not Texas. It may also
interference with the porosity of theexplain why Uranium Resources (OTC BB: URRE)
formation, Snow switched to nitric acid, buthas looked beyond Texas into New Mexico to
admitted, "We were reluctant to use nitricdevelop its ISL operation, and Strathmore
acid because it was much more expensive thanMinerals has quickly been advancing through
sulfuric." But they did, because the nitricits permitting stage on one of its properties
acid solution did not form gypsum. Unlikein that state. It is fitting that the big
present-day ISL methods used in Texas,past uranium producing states may again
Nebraska and Wyoming, Utah Construction didbecome tomorrow's leading U.S. producers. In
not use a carbonated leaching solution inany event, the entire world of ISL mining
their solution mining. Nitric solution wasowes a debt of gratitude to Charles Don Snow
used during the 1960s and continued until thefor his pioneering efforts in bringing a heap
Lucky Mc switched over to open pit mining.Itleach experiment into full fruition as
all started as a heap leach experiment. "Wemodern-day in-situ mining.James Finch
had quite a bit of low grade in Lucky Mc,"contributes to and other publications.
Snow told us, "so we thought we would try a



1 A B 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80